The 100k context window of Claude 21 has been a huge boon for me since now I can paste a moderately complex problem to the chat window and ask questions about it. In that spirit, it recently refactored some pretty gnarly conditional logic for me in such an elegant manner that it absolutely blew me away. Now, I know how bitmasks2 work and am aware of the existence of enum.Flag3 in Python. However, it never crossed my mind that flags can be leveraged to trim conditional branches in such a clever manner that Claude illustrated. But once I looked at the proposed solution, the whole thing immediately clicked for me.

The conundrum

Here’s a problem that’s similar to what I was trying to solve. Let’s say we have instances of a Client entity that need to be notified when some special event occurs in our system. The notification can happen in three ways: email, webhook, and postal mail. These are the three attributes on the Client class that determine which notification method will be used:

class Client:
    email: str
    url: str
    address: str

The business logic requires that the system must abide by the following rules while sending notifications:

  • If only email is populated, send an email.
  • If only url is populated, send a webhook.
  • If only address is populated, send a postal mail.
  • If email and url are populated, send an email and a webhook.
  • If email and address are populated, only send an email.
  • If url and address are populated, only send a webhook.
  • If all three are populated, send both an email and a webhook.
  • At least one attribute must be populated, or it’s an error.

Notice how the business logic wants to minimize sending notifications via postal mail. Postal mails are expensive and will only be sent if address is the only attribute on the Client instance. In any other cases, emails and webhooks are preferred.

First shot

The notify function takes in a Client object and sprouts a few conditional branches to send notifications while maintaining the business constraints.

def notify(client: Client) -> None:
    """Apply business logic and invoke the desired notification handlers."""

    if and not client.url and not client.address:

    elif client.url and not and not client.address:

    elif client.address and not and not client.url:

    elif and client.url and not client.address:

    elif and client.address and not client.url:

    elif client.url and client.address and not

    elif and client.url and client.address:

        raise ValueError("at least one attribute must be populated")

Whoa! Lots of if-else branches for such a simple scenario. Since there are 3 attributes in the complete set, we have to make sure we’re writing 2^3=8 branches to cover all the possible subsets. For 4, 5, 6 … attributes, the number of branches will increase as powers of 2: 2^4=16, 2^5=32, 2^6=64 … and so on. Then our tests will need to be able to verify each of these branches. We can try to apply De Morgan’s law to simplify some of the negation logic.

De Morgan’s laws allow us to take the negation of a conditional statement and distribute it across the operators, changing ANDs to ORs and vice versa, and flipping the negation of each component. This can help simplify complex boolean logic statements.

So this:

if and not client.url and not client.address:

Can become:

if and not (client.url or client.address):

However, that still doesn’t reduce the number of branches. Bitmasks can help us to get out of this pothole.

A quick primer on bitwise operations & bitmasking

Bitwise operations allow manipulating numbers at the individual bit level. This is useful for compactly storing and accessing data, performing fast calculations, and implementing low-level algorithms. Here’s a list of bitwise operations:

  • Bitwise AND (&): Takes two numbers and performs the logical AND operation on each pair of corresponding bits. Returns a number where a bit is 1 only if that bit is 1 in both input numbers.

  • Bitwise OR (|): Takes two numbers and performs the logical OR operation on each pair of corresponding bits. Returns a number where a bit is 1 if that bit is 1 in either or both input numbers.

  • Bitwise XOR (^): Takes two numbers and performs the logical XOR (exclusive OR) operation on each pair of corresponding bits. Returns a number where a bit is 1 if that bit is 1 in exactly one of the input numbers (but not both).

  • Bitwise NOT (~): Takes a single number and flips all its bits.

  • Left shift («): Shifts the bits of a number to the left by a specified number of positions. Zeros are shifted in on the right. Equivalent to multiplying by 2^n where n is the number of positions shifted.

  • Right shift (»): Shifts the bits of a number to the right by a specified number of positions. Zeros are shifted in on the left. Equivalent to integer division by 2^n.

Here’s an example displaying these operators:

a = 60  # 60    = 0011 1100
b = 13  # 13    = 0000 1101
print(a & b)  # 12    = 0000 1100 (0011 1100 & 0000 1101 = 0000 1100)
print(a | b)  # 61    = 0011 1101 (0011 1100 | 0000 1101 = 0011 1101)
print(a ^ b)  # 49    = 0011 0001 (0011 1100 ^ 0000 1101 = 0011 0001)
print(~a)  # -61   = 1100 0011 (~0011 1100 = 1100 0011)
print(a << 2)  # 240   = 1111 0000 (0011 1100 << 2 = 1111 0000)
print(a >> 2)  # 15    = 0000 1111 (0011 1100 >> 2 = 0000 1111)

Bitmasks are integers that represent a set of flags using bits as boolean values. Bitmasking uses bitwise operators to manipulate and access these flags. A common use of bitmasks is to compactly store multiple boolean values or options in a single integer, where each bit position has a specific meaning if it is 1. In the next section, we’ll use this capability to clip the conditional statements in the notify function.

For example, here’s a bitmask representing text style options:

# Flags
BOLD = 1  # 0000 0001
ITALIC = 2  # 0000 0010
UNDERLINE = 4  # 0000 0100

# Bitmask
STYLE = BOLD | ITALIC  # 0000 0011 - bold and italic

We use powers of 2 (1, 2, 4, 8, etc.) for the flag values so that each bit position corresponds to a single flag, and the flags can be combined using bitwise OR without overlapping. This allows testing and accessing each flag independently:

has_bold = STYLE & BOLD == BOLD  # True
has_italic = STYLE & ITALIC == ITALIC  # True
has_underline = STYLE & UNDERLINE == UNDERLINE  # False

And toggle an option on or off using XOR:

STYLE ^= BOLD  # Toggles BOLD bit on/off

You can do a ton of other cool stuff with bitwise operations and bitmasks. However, this is pretty much all we need to know to curtail the twisted conditional branching necessitated by the business logic. Check out this incredibly in-depth article4 from Real Python on this topic if you want to dig deeper into bitwise operations.

Pruning conditional branches with flags

With all the intros and primers out of the way, we can now start working towards making the notify function more tractable and testable. We’ll do that in 3 phases:

  • First, we’re gonna define a flag-type enum called NotifyStatus which will house all the valid states our notification system can be in. Any state that’s not explicitly defined as an enum variant is invalid.

  • Second, we’ll write a function named get_notify_status that’ll take in a Client object as input, apply the business logic and return the appropriate NotifyStatus enum variant. This function won’t be responsible for dispatching the actual notification handlers; rather, it’ll just map the attribute values of the Client instance to a fitting enum variant. We do this to keep the core business logic devoid of any external dependencies—following Gary Bernhardt’s functional core, imperative shell5 ethos.

  • Finally, we’ll define the notify function that’ll just accept the enum variant returned by the previous function and invoke the desired notification handlers.

The NotifyStatus enum is defined as follows:

class NotifyStatus(Flag):
    # Valid primary variants (flags)
    EMAIL = 1
    URL = 2
    ADDRESS = 4

    # Valid composite variants (bitmasks)

Here, the EMAIL, URL, and ADDRESS variants correspond to the eponymous attributes on the Client instance. Then we define the composite variants (bitmasks) to compactly represent the valid states the system can be in. For example, EMAIL_URL = EMAIL | URL means that on the Client instance, email and url attributes are populated but address isn’t. Likewise, EMAIL_URL_ADDRESS denotes that all the attributes are populated. The biggest benefit we get from this is that we don’t need to write the negation logic explicitly; the bitmasks encode that information inherently. This representation will grossly simplify the implementation of the business logic.

Now, let’s write the get_notify_status function that’ll take in an instance of Client and return the appropriate NotifyStatus variant based on our business logic:

def get_notify_status(client: Client) -> NotifyStatus:
    status = 0
        status |= NotifyStatus.EMAIL.value
    if client.url:
        status |= NotifyStatus.URL.value
    if client.address:
        status |= NotifyStatus.ADDRESS.value
    if status == 0:
        raise ValueError("Invalid status")

    return NotifyStatus(status)

This is the full implementation of our business logic in its entirety. It checks which of the notification attributes among email, url, and address are populated on the Client object. For each one that is populated, it picks the corresponding variant from the NotifyStatus enum and sets the variant bit in the status integer using bitwise OR. If all three attributes are empty, it raises a ValueError. The final value of status is then used to return the correct NotifyStatus enum variant.

On the last step, the notify function can take the NotifyStatus variant returned by the get_notify_status function and dispatch the correct notification handlers like this:

def notify(notify_status: NotifyStatus) -> None:
    # Mapping between enum variants and notification handlers
    actions = {
        NotifyStatus.EMAIL: [send_email],
        NotifyStatus.URL: [send_webhook],
        NotifyStatus.ADDRESS: [send_mail],
        NotifyStatus.EMAIL_URL: [send_email, send_webhook],
        NotifyStatus.EMAIL_ADDRESS: [send_email],
        NotifyStatus.URL_ADDRESS: [send_webhook],
        NotifyStatus.EMAIL_URL_ADDRESS: [send_email, send_webhook],

    if notify_status not in actions:
        raise ValueError("invalid notify status")

    for action in actions[notify_status]:

Observe how we’ve totally eliminated conditional statements from the notify function. The key takeaway here is that the program flow is now flatter and easier to follow. The core business logic is neatly tucked inside the get_notify_status routine, and the NotifyStatus enum explicitly defines all the valid states that the system can be in. This also means that if a new notification channel pops up, all we’ll need to do is update three flat constructs and write the corresponding tests instead of battling with the twisted conditional statements that we started with. Not too shabby, eh?

Recent posts

  • Here-doc headache
  • The sane pull request
  • I kind of like rebasing
  • Protobuffed contracts
  • TypeIs does what I thought TypeGuard would do in Python
  • ETag and HTTP caching
  • Crossing the CORS crossroad
  • Dysfunctional options pattern in Go
  • Einstellung effect
  • Strategy pattern in Go